Moderator: stereophile
TA-F333ESG wrote:I know a lot of TAEs and UTOTs use these carts
Which of the two would go best with our beloved Technics TT? Specially if you listen to a lot of Brubecks, Sinatras and Fitzgeralds...throw in some occasional Claptons and Mahlers in the mix.
troporobo wrote:If you know where to get V15VxMR at a reasonable price please let me know This is my cart and I am absolutely not looking forward to the day it goes to that great analog junkyard in the sky and I have to find a replacement I have seen NOS models go for up to $600
Anyway, the two carts are best suited to very different tonearms. The Shure is best on an arm with low effective mass since it is very high compliance. The Denon is better suited to a medium to heavy arm since it is relatively low compliance. I don't know the Technics arm but you can find the effective mass at the Vinyl Engine and a calculator at the Cartridge Database. Then there is tracking ability. The Shure is generally regarded as a much better tracker than the Denon. Is this important to your setup and vinyl collection? Finally, there is the question of gain. The Shure is high output MM, while the Denon is a low output MC. What will your phono stage handle?
So there are a few variables to sort out first before you can decide on a "house sound" to pursue
dannyb wrote:suggest you get the few remaining replacement stylus for the V15 type 5 MxR available on some internet audio sites while you still can. even now they go for around US$150-200 @
troporobo wrote:dannyb wrote:suggest you get the few remaining replacement stylus for the V15 type 5 MxR available on some internet audio sites while you still can. even now they go for around US$150-200 @
If you know a source at that price range please do share
The best I can find anywhere on the net these days is $495
BTW, I have been been considering the Ortofon 540 MkII as a replacement - it is very similar in many ways to the V15VxMR: high compliance, very low mass, 3.0 MV output, Fritz Geiger nude stylus
TA-F333ESG wrote:thanks dannyb, troporobo and doc for your inputs. seems we have a lot of shure fans here
is it really worlds appart from the venerable m-447 or m-44g? yes, i'm quite aware of the price difference, apples and oranges right? but are technics table able to flesh out the best from these expensive carts to merit the investment? if the m-447 get you to 75-80%, how much more will the 103s and v15s bump things up?
TA-F333ESG wrote:hi detubo,
based on specs, the v15s should sound more "quiet" when used with not so pristine albums due to its micro ridge stylus. with the 103s conical stylus, is surface noise a big issue as compared to the V15s?
TA-F333ESG wrote:thanks dannyb, troporobo and doc for your inputs. seems we have a lot of shure fans here
is it really worlds appart from the venerable m-447 or m-44g?
TA-F333ESG wrote:yes, i'm quite aware of the price difference, apples and oranges right? but are technics table able to flesh out the best from these expensive carts to merit the investment?
TA-F333ESG wrote:if the m-447 get you to 75-80%, how much more will the 103s and v15s bump things up?
TA-F333ESG wrote:if the m-447 get you to 75-80%, how much more will the 103s and v15s bump things up?
stereophile wrote:. . . Shure cannot acquire anymore the rare & expensive beryllium . . .
stereophile wrote:It will be difficult to find a V15xMR now.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest