Moderator: dante
KD wrote:zach would know. I'm guessing around 1972.
johnlen wrote:i am getting confused, somewhere i've read that those with PARI logo are better (sounding), and then some would say that those pre-PARI era LPs are the ones to grab.
which is which?
KD wrote:Buy the music, not the label.
There are those who say early PARI were made with recycled vinyl, but I have bought some of those which are relatively noise-free.
stereophile wrote:KD wrote:Buy the music, not the label.
There are those who say early PARI were made with recycled vinyl, but I have bought some of those which are relatively noise-free.
You should follow the wisdom of our analog statesman KD! If you like it, and can't get an import, then buy it. What I did notice is that a lot of the pre-PARI local LPs had thicker vinyl(and consequently: thicker grooves). Some, even had US covers. More modern pressings can only be found in the PARI era.
My thoughts about this: Many times, you cannot get an import copy of the LP you want. Sometimes you just have to make do with a local copy. If it's mint or sealed(barring warpage) then that's a blessing. It may not hold up against an import, but at least you have something to play while waiting for 'the better copy'. Plaka pa rin yan!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests