Moderator: mandym
mandym wrote:In my unbiased opinion, in combination with the sonic advantages of wood, the reduction of much of the extraneous vibrations results in such a big improvement in resolution that adjustments in VTA become very apparent. Mandy
pigdog wrote:i think i was able to find the sweet spot for this arm as clearly it is tracking beautifully and man the SLAM this arm can produce! not bad for my first attempt to set up this arm and it is a unipivot one at that! the mammothed denon sounded totally unlike the usual 103s that i am familiar with, this mod made this cart reach teh big leagues! its giving my 47labs mcbee a run for the money! currently doing A/B comparison with the schroders arm and i can safely say both are pretty much head to head in terms of sonic quality and tracking. currenly playing Sade's Love Deluxe
mandym wrote:pigdog wrote:i think i was able to find the sweet spot for this arm as clearly it is tracking beautifully and man the SLAM this arm can produce! not bad for my first attempt to set up this arm and it is a unipivot one at that! the mammothed denon sounded totally unlike the usual 103s that i am familiar with, this mod made this cart reach teh big leagues! its giving my 47labs mcbee a run for the money! currently doing A/B comparison with the schroders arm and i can safely say both are pretty much head to head in terms of sonic quality and tracking. currenly playing Sade's Love Deluxe
Hi Chester,
I'm glad you like the arm.
The arm was not designed as a champion tracker but it tracks like one. I don't know exactly why that is but I'll take it! While taking it through it's paces over several months, I never came across a record it can't track including RCA's torture record Audio Symphony!
For my taste, I find setting the VTA just a bit "tail down" and VTF at 2.7 grams to be ideal for this arm/cartridge. I do the initial setting-up using a good mono recording. This way, I don't get distracted by stereo effects. After getting the VTA set to where the sound is neither too "soft" nor too "hard", I adjust the azimuth. This oft-neglected adjustment is actually more than "icing on the cake". It is what takes the images to dead-center, gives the illusion of depth (yes, even in mono!) and snaps it into focus. I then put on a stereo record to fine tune the VTA until I get a good soundstage. The procedure is repeated a few times; "no pain, no gain".
I am just AWED by your favorable comparison to the top-class Shroeder tonearm! As a designer, I would of course hope that my arm creams it but just between you and me, I would have been happy enough if it didn't get SLAM-DUNKED by the Shroeder .
Pictures, Maestro please!
Chester, have you located the Chinese wooden tonearm maker yet?
Mandy
Jon Agner wrote:Ches,
you're using the 103r right? Try to increase VTF to around 2.5-2.6 and keep VTA at level, and check how it sounds
mandym wrote:Thanks for the pictures Chester.They are gorgeous. The tonearm/armpod don't look DIY at all. I am very pleased!
Holst's Mars? I hope your neighbors didn't call the police.
Satisfied with the sound? Now, you can do the finale, the "icing on the cake". Put on a good mono record (preferably one with throaty vocals) and twiddle the azimuth by sliding the side weight around. Don't pay too much reliance on the absolute perpendicularity of the stylus since manufacturing tolerances come into the picture. TRUST YOUR EARS!
You will know when you get there. A coherent image takes dead center and the mono signal attains depth, the instruments going way behind the singer! I don't know why this happens on a mono signal but it does, maybe a matter of Psychoacoustics(?). It will leave you breathless!
Over the months that I have used the tonearm I have grown quite attached to her. Although I miss her very much, I am happy that she has found an appreciative master. God speed, my little one, serve your master well.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests