Differences between Conical, Elliptical, Fine Line Styli

For Vinyl and Record lovers: turntables, cartridges, etc.

Moderator: dante

Differences between Conical, Elliptical, Fine Line Styli

Postby zenaudio » Wed Feb 25, 2015 9:39 pm

User avatar
zenaudio
Fanatic
Fanatic
 
Posts: 2038
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2003 9:34 pm

Re: Differences between Conical, Elliptical, Fine Line Styli

Postby Voltraizer » Thu Feb 26, 2015 10:06 pm

some interesting points to consider:
Apparently according to Jico (manufacturer of the highly regarded SAS stylus), the amount of playing time where a stylus will maintain its specified level of distortion at 15kHz is as follows:

Spherical / Conical - 150hrs
Eliptical - 250hrs
Shibata/Line contact - 400hrs
SAS/MicrRidge - 500hrs

SUMMARY

In pure sonic terms on pristine vinyl a top notch eliptical can do as well as all but the very best Line Contact / Shibata styli, but will ultimately be surpassed by the better MicroLine styli.

However in terms of reduced wear on both stylus and records - the entry point is the Line contact / Shibata category.

In terms of playing back worn vinyl line contact stylus types also have an advantage in that they can contact "virgin" unworn vinyl.

Narrower side radius = improved tracking and reduced high frequency distortion
User avatar
Voltraizer
Fanatic
Fanatic
 
Posts: 1956
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 8:21 pm
Location: Makati

Re: Differences between Conical, Elliptical, Fine Line Styli

Postby troporobo » Fri Feb 27, 2015 9:28 am

Easy - one sounds a lot better than the others. I'll let you guys argue over which one!
User avatar
troporobo
Fanatic
Fanatic
 
Posts: 1309
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2004 8:46 pm
Location: Manila


Return to Analog

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests